Search This Blog




Total Pageviews

Friday, December 15, 2017

"Frozen Bigfoot Head" and Some Musings on Skeptical Cryptozoology

Peter Caine is back in Bigfoot news again, with his supposed "severed head" of a Bigfoot. Sometime earlier this year (or around that time) he had a bunch of stuff on other frozen Bigfoot body parts he says he has, but I didn't put anything up on here because it was so stupid.
Peter Caine and his "bigfoot head"
(The Sun)

But now, he has apparently revealed his Bigfoot "head." The Sun is reporting on his claim, and their article is below:

"Peter Caine, from New York, released the questionable clip on YouTube - where believers thanked him for 'vindicating' them.
"A COMEDIAN is insisting he has proof of Bigfoot's existence - as he shows off a furry lump that he claims is the creature's severed head.
"Peter Caine, from New York, released the questionable clip on YouTube - where believers praised and thanked him for 'vindicating' them.
"Sasquatch-hunters even suggested conducting a 'DNA test' on the hilarious-looking object to finally silence the doubters.
"Footage shows Peter examining what he claims is the head of the elusive beast, which he says his dad shot n 1953.
"Since then, he says he has been keeping the 8.5-stone cranium in his freezer.
"He doesn't really go into why he is only just getting it out now.
"Despite its comical appearance, Peter insists the 'head' is real.
"He says: 'I've taken a lot of s*** on my YouTube channel - people saying that I'm always making jokes, this is not real - this is real!' 
 "And at least some of the people commenting on the clip seem to believe him.
"One wrote: 'Looks the same as the one we saw here in Florida.
"'I was not a believer till I saw one for myself…now I question everything. But I know it's real.'
"Another said: 'Wow Peter. I'm a nurse with 35 years' experience and many of those years were in the Operating Room/Surgery. This really looks real!'
"A third commented: 'I feel vindicated. Thank you Peter, thank you.'
"And one suggested: 'Why don't you have it analyzed? I think it would be great to see a DNA testing video as a follow up.'
"Numerous people have claimed to have proof of Bigfoot over the years, and there are new 'sightings' reported all the time.
"In October, a farmer claimed he had seen a whole family of Bigfeet, carrying a pig while running through his Californian ranch.
"Meanwhile, back in June, a mysterious video appeared to show a Bigfoot-type creature swinging through the trees near a hiking trail in California.
"And in another case, from April, bizarre footage showed a man-like creature peeking at tourists from behind a tree."

So, now lets take a minute to examine this, and cryptozoology as a whole.

Back either earlier this year or late last year, Caine had posted a lot of videos on his YouTube channel showing various frozen body parts of his supposed Bigfoot. And from watching only a few, I figured out (quickly) that the guy was a nut. (Not to mention his language and comments to anyone who didn't believe him weren't very nice at all, putting it nicely!) He also claimed that he had had the remains examined and that Bigfoot had officially been given the scientific name Cainis Apis Skunis (and I'm just guessing on how you would spell that!) and that it was named after him, something like "Caine's Skunk Ape" or some rubbish like that.

But, knowing a thing or two about animals and how scientific names work, I knew that he could not be telling the truth because that is not what a name would be like. If anything the part with his name (which would be identifying a certain species of a genus) would come last, with the genus name coming first. Also, "Canis" is the scientific name for canines, with Canis lupus being the wolf, and Canis lupus familiaris being the domestic dog, etc.

Also, DNA tests are extremely expensive, and I don't think this guy looks like he has the money to get that done.

I didn't find his story of how the Bigfoot came to its demise very convincing either. Like it said in the article, he claims his father shot it in 1953, but how could his dad kill a Bigfoot when there have been countless other reports of people shooting Bigfoot and having nothing happen? In one video he did show the "Bigfoot killing gun" (can't remember the model), and it didn't look like it could take down a Sasquatch.

But what about the somewhat-realistic look of some of Caine's "body parts?" And the woman who said she was a nurse and that it looked real? Well, I'll spare you the trouble of having to watch any of his videos to find out the answer - Caine is an artist and makes tons of sculptures. Some of which he showed in a video, which were disgusting insults to the President of the United States and somehow got in a New York art gallery. In another video, he even said a mama Bigfoot had a baby in his bathroom! (But, believe it or not, it was a guy in a suit and Peter's dog with a wig on!) So it shouldn't be surprising if these "Bigfoot parts" are just good sculptures (and I bet they are).

And all of this brings me to another point that I thought would be good to mention in this article.

As I already said, Caine frequently insults anyone who doesn't believe him in his videos by saying many things that won't be put on here. But my question is - why would you openly insult people who don't believe you when they have very good reason not too?

There is nothing wrong with having a skeptical mind when it comes to investigating cryptid stories. In fact, it is better to have one than to just go in believing everything. I was like that when I first heard stories of cryptids (granted, I was in elementary school) but now I take everything with a grain of salt. Most people who read this blog will know I put about zero credence in many of the sightings of Bigfoot, lake monsters, etc. that I post about on here, because really all of them are blurry pictures on some website, which basically means "fake." People like Caine and diehard believers  have no reason for being mad at someone who says that this or that sighting may not be a real Bigfoot. In case all those people haven't noticed - no one has accomplished any more than anyone else has since the 1950s by screaming in the woods just because that's what the Animal Planet producers made the Finding Bigfoot guys do. That's not what anyone did before that!

And this applies to all other parts of cryptozoology as well. For some good discussion on this subject, I recommend the episodes of Colin Schneider's Crypto-Kid podcast when he had Ben Radford on. In the most recent, they discussed Champ and basically disproved the Mansi photo, which is heralded by many as the "best evidence" for that lake monster, and when he had Sharon Hill on.
Monster… or log?

So my advice to those who are getting interested in cryptozoolgy (and those who are diehard believers of Caine's nonsense) is to be a little more skeptical about things. I still think Bigfoot exists - in fact, from talking to people who say they saw it I'm sure - but that doesn't mean I believe everything I hear. And no one else should believe everything they hear either, because a lot of it will be stuff like this.

Bigfoot in the freezer for 60 years? Yeah, right...

Silver Bridge Collapse at 50 Years, And Coleman's New Mothman Book

Today, December 15, 2017, marks the 50th anniversary of the Silver Bridge collapse. The Silver Bridge spanned the Ohio River and connected Gallipolis, Ohio to Point Pleasant, West Virginia. Take a moment to remember the 46 people who lost their lives on the bridge.

 Point Pleasant is, of course, famous for the sightings of Mothman throughout 1966-67. That is why today also happens to be the publication date of a new book by Loren Coleman - Mothman: Evil Incarnate.

"'Loren Coleman has taken a hard look at one of America's most haunting monsters and discovered that it's more terrifying than we ever knew. Read this book now - before it's too late. You've been warned.' - Richard Hatem, screenwriter, The Mothman Prophecies
"Mothman: Evil Incarnate, by cryptozoologist Loren Coleman, is a brand new companion title to the late John Keel's The Mothman Prophecies (1975), which investigated the sightings of a winged creature called Mothman and became popularized in the 2002 movie of the same name starring Richard Gere.
"With new material by Loren Coleman, extensive annotations on each chapter of The Mothman Prophecies, a detailed Mothman death list, and a gallery of images, Mothman: Evil Incarnate comprises the most up-to-date information on Mothman phenomena. In addition to providing context to John Keel's cult classic, Coleman expands on the missing details from the movie, explores the deaths that followed the West Virginia incident, describes the recent Chicago Mothman sightings, and delves into the life of John Keel. This companion book should find its place on every Mothman aficionado and cryptozoology fan's bookshelf. The mystery continues…"

About the author:

"LOREN COLEMAN is one of the world's leading cryptozoologists. In 1960 he started his fieldwork, and after years pursuing cryptozoological mysteries, he began writing. He is the author of numerous books on cryptozoology, including Bigfoot: The True Story of Apes in America and Mothman and Other Curious Encounters. Coleman is the founder and director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine ( Loren Coleman can be followed on Twitter at @CryptoLoren and on his blog,"
With Loren Coleman,
Mothman Festival 2016

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Hawkesbury River Creature?

The Daily Star has a recent article up on a mystery "HUMAN-LIKE CREATURE" that was filmed in an Australian river.
(Daily Star)

The article reads:

"FOOTAGE has emerged of an unknown human-like creature floating in a river popular among fishermen.
"In the clip, recorded by 65-year-old Fethi Ada, you see a dark-looking object appearing to float along the river.
"It dunks its head under the surface before appearing again.
"The video then cuts before we can get a closer look at what this could possibly be.
"The footage was recorded during a family fishing trip on the Hawkesbury River in Australia.
"Speaking to 7News, the man who recorded the clip said: 'It looked human the way it lifted its head up.
"'It looked over towards us like who are these people.
"'My brother threw some bait in and then it just got scared off.
"But, Secretary of Hawkesbury River Rescue, Felicity Brownrigg, viewed the video and was not as convinced about what it was.
"Felicity said: 'It's rear you actually get to see many (animals) as they stay below the surface.
"'My guess would be that it is a seal.'
"Seals are not commonly known to reside in this part of Australian waters.
"Felicity also said the occasional bull shark and whale calf have been spotted in the river.
"Just last week terrifying footage was captured of a man surfing over a bull shark.

I would have to agree with Brownrigg that this is no "river monster." It could be a seal, but in the 10-second video it also looks like it could be the back of a turtle to me. Either way, not a cryptid creature.

What do you think?

"Sea Monsters" of 2017

That's the title of a new article I have in Cryptid Culture Magazine #7... go to Blurb now and check out the new issue!

Monday, December 11, 2017

Crypto-Kid: Jon Downes and Prehistoric Survivors Tonight

From Colin Schneider:

"Tonight on the Crypto-Kid I will be joined by Jonathan Downes once again. Jon is a fan favorite guest and is always my go-to-guy when I need a guest. We will be discussing the idea of surviving prehistoric creatures tonight."

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Yetis are Bears (Again)

(Pandy Corona, Wikipedia)

Recently published: DNA analysis regarding samples of "yeti hair."

The Denver Post reports:

"The yeti, or abominable snowman, is one of the most sought-after animals that does not exist. A long line of explorers, including mountaineers Sir Edmund Hillary and Reinhold Messner, reported seeing strange figures and footprints in the Himalayas. Said to walk on two legs through the Tibetan Plateau, the yeti is described as a hairy and humanoid primate, partway between gorilla and David Letterman's beard.
"If you wish to hunt a yeti, there are just three rules to follow. If you find one, no talking to the press, not without permission from Nepali government officials. You can take the animal alive, but you cannot harm it: Shooting is to be done with camera's only, per a 1959 State Department memo (an exception is carved out for self-defense). And you must pay Nepal 5,000 rupees ($48.50) for a yeti permit.
"We would encourage you to spend those 5,000 rupees elsewhere. You won't find a yeti in yeti habitat. But, if you're lucky, you might stumble upon a bear.
"In a new genetic analysis, yeti bones, fur and other biological material turned out to be bear parts. 'All the samples that were supposed to be yetis matched brown and black bears that are living in the region,' said Charlotte Lindqvist, who studies bear evolution at the University of Buffalo in New York and Singapore's Nanyang Technological University.
"(There was just one exception. A yeti tooth kept at the Reinhold Messner Mountain Museum was a dog's.)
"Lindqvist and her colleagues, the authors of a report published Tuesday in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, extracted DNA from nine yeti samples and more than a dozen known bear specimens, collected in zoos and a national park in Pakistan.
"The connection between yeti and bear is an old one. Messner and Hillary eventually concluded what they had seen were bears. Biologists have made the link, too. In 2013, Oxford University issued a worldwide call for yeti samples. Oxford geneticists Bryan Sykes said that DNA from hairs revealed the yeti was similar to an ancient, extinct polar bear. For a moment, this biological curiosity revived hopes that an undiscovered animal loped through Tibetan snow.
"'I think this bear, which nobody has seen alive… may still be there and may have quite a lot of polar bear in it,' Sykes told the BBC in 2013.
"But other genetics experts, notably Ross Barnett at the University of Copenhagen, contested that finding. Sykes had made an error, partly due to degraded DNA, according to a re-analysis of the research by Barnett and University of Huddersfield bimolecular archaeologist Ceiridwen Edwards.
"It was as off 'Sykes had the letters Y-E-T and, searching for matches, he though he found YETI,' Barnett said. Sykes acknowledged the error but maintained that the yeti hair could have come from a polar bear or ursine hybrid.
"The new work is more robust, Barnett said, probably 'the most rigorous in terms of samples and sequence lengths.' Where snippets of DNA revealed YET, Lindqvist's deep genetic dive produced  'ALL THE SAMPLES ARE BROWN BEARS YET PEOPLE STILL BELIEVE,' Barnett said. 'Very little chance of matching that string to something else by chance.'
"Though Himalayan brown bears are neither abominable nor snowmen, they are still pretty unusual animals, the DNA analysis revealed.
"Brown bears hav conquered the Northern Hemisphere's forests, in Canada, Russia, the United States - grizzlies are a brown bear subspecies - and 42 other countries. (In the United States, sightings of bears on two legs have left observers wondering about the true nature of Bigfoot and Sasquatch, too.) Despite their wide spread across the globe, many brown bears have run into danger. 'There has been a lot of extinction of brown bears around the world,' Lindqvist said. 
"Himalayan brown bears are not exempt from bad news. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature lists the subspecies as critically endangered.
"That loss of life makes it tough for experts to unravel a tangled bear ancestry. But the DNA sequences produced by Lindqvist and her colleagues were sufficient to create a family tree for the Himalayan and Tibetan brown bears. Though it is unclear where brown bears first evolved, Lindqvist said, their evolutionary history 'certainly does suggest that they may come from an area in Asia.'
"The new genetics research indicates that the isolated bears are a 'relic population.' Put another way, these were the first brown bears, Lindqvist said, to split off form all the other subspecies, 600,000 years ago.
"Both researchers predicted that that yeti myth will survive this latest study. The yeti 'is very important to the local culture and folklore,' Lindqvist said. 'Perhaps the Western hype about the yeti, we can put that to rest.'"

Or will they?

It seems as though this new analysis may have its own flaws, just like the Sykes study.

Loren Coleman has mentioned the following on his blog CryptoZooNews:

"For decades, cryptozoologists have pointed to there being three kinds of Yetis - a small Yeti, a human-sized Yeti, and a quite large bear-like Yeti. Explorer Tom Slick investigated these three types in the Himalayas in the 1950s. Bernard Heuvelmans and Ivan T. Sanderson in the late 1950s and 1960s, as well as modern researchers this century, including myself, Mark A. Hall, and Patrick Huyghe, called this variety the Dzu-Teh. The recent Bryan Sykes' study confirmed there were bear artifacts behind some of the so-called Yeti samples he studied and which were highlighted by Icon Films. Should we be surprised that 'bear' results are to be found if selections of those samples are retested?"


"Two of the samples (tooth and fur) from Messner's so-called Nazi 'Yeti' were understood to be implanted teeth (Canis) and non-primate fur (Ursidae), already by investigators. Two other samples were misidentified by Sykes as at first ancient polar bear, then the hybrid brown-polar bear, and brown bear, nevertheless, were bear. Icon Films produced several films that funded Sykes to do DNA tests on dozens of samples, and via information from Sykes' book and in Icon's documentaries (also the Bigfoot one), bear results were detailed. If only 'nine' samples are sent along to Dr. Lindqvist, why only those?"
"Who Funded Dr Lindqvist's study, partially? Icon Films."
With Jeff Meldrum

Dr. Jeff Meldrum also had this to say: "…a casual viewing of their [Icon's] documentary makes it apparent that most of the sources were known bear specimens to begin with…"

If most of the "yeti" samples were known to be bears, and - believe it or not! - found to be bears, and then sent to another study and found again to be bears (because they are),  does this completely disprove the yeti? Not really. While some yeti sightings and legends most definitely are bears, there still seems to be, as Coleman noted, a few different "kinds" of yetis. I feel that this study could have been a bit more interesting if the new team examined new samples and not the ones that had already been examined, but it seems that Icon Films only wants to put out this explanation, and I think we can end with some words from Dr. Meldrum:

"The most compelling evidence of a relic hominoid species in the Himalaya remains the footprints documented by the McNeely-Cronin Expedition to the Arun Valley in 1972. The Icon Films producers were not interested in considering this evidence during my interview. Unraveling the bear and hominoid threads remains the challenge before serious investigators. But to ignore the evidence suggesting a possible hominoid, while making dismissive statements based on questionable 'yeti' evidence readily attributable to bears is hardly an objective approach."

Indeed, it is not.

Cronin's photo, 1972, Left foot
Right foot

American Monster Tour

Coming in 2018!

"Join cryptid investigators Ken Gerhard and Lyle Blackburn as they examine amazing legends and mysterious creatures across the American landscape."

Monday, December 4, 2017

"Top" Cryptozoology Lists of 2017

As he does every year, Loren Coleman has started putting up his "Top… 'things' of 2017" lists on is blog CryptoZooNews.   

Check them out:

Gino D/Achille
Passed away Feb. 2017

One of Gino's paintings

Crypto-Kid: Joshua Cutchin Tonight

From Colin Schneider:

"Tonight on the Crypto-Kid, I will be joined by author and Fortean extraordinaire, Joshua Cutchin. Joshua and I will discuss cryptids, folklore, and faeries. There isn't a big plan; we are going to see where the conversation goes. This is going to be a fun and fascinating episode, so don't miss it. You can listen in at and don't forget to check out the chatroom!"

Saturday, December 2, 2017

The Flatwoods Monster: A Legacy of Fear - Full Trailer

Below is the full length trailer for Small Town Monsters' upcoming documentary The Flatwoods Monster: A Legacy of Fear. The film takes a look at the famous Flatwoods UFO/monster case from the 1950s and will be released in April of 2018.

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Peddling the Paranormal (Guest Post)


Andrew McGrath


1 Born Every Minute

In our present age of tweets and memes, fake news and social media witch hunts, one can be forgiven for thinking that the generations that spring forth from this new cultural self-over-exposure, will be buffeted about on the winds of opinion, no strangers to a change in direction, if only enough righteous tweets and screets are aimed in their direction. It is this culture of amnesiac emotional and moral shifts where we currently find both judge and jury in full swing, operating outside of the authority and safety of the courtroom, where evidence is no longer king and the accused is guilty until proven innocent! This is now our de facto reality in our trail by Twitter world!

It is therefore no surprise that the philosophy one ascribes to, even in our very own slightly 'south of heaven' genre of the unknown, can make or break your acceptance into the higher echelons of the initiate opinion makers of cryptozoology and the paranormal. Historically those who have risked a defined opinion outside of this scope have been summarily discredited or ignored by a historic culture of mystery crusaders and paranormal propagandists. This can be seen in a reticence to identify reported cryptozoological creatures as defined animals, based upon corroborative anecdotal, photographic and film evidence; and a default position which attempts to identify all uncomfortable creatures of cryptozoology as either monster impostors, or in cases where the eyewitness is very credible and descriptive, as paranormal in substance and therefore out of the scope of explanation by natural means. Thereby closing down all discussion upon the zoological nature of these creatures and effectively handing over the investigation to the department of the paranormal for further 'study.'

2 Sides to Every Coin

In fairness to pursuers of the paranormal there are certainly enough mysterious reports out there to be rightly and justifiably 'passed' on to them and even some of the more ambiguous cases could easily belong to their camp. However, being of a practical nature myself and having grown up in a religious environment, I see clearly how one's personal philosophy, or faith, can have a significant effect on the perception of what one sees, or believes to see and how personal desire can imprint its own interpretation on to what we observe.

In more ancient times, in the west at least, we projected our superstition on to the things around us and imbued their wondrous physiological traits with supernatural meaning. I personally lean towards the philosophical position that ancient societies spiritualized animal traits that they could not understand, and I see that in our modern times we have slid towards a position of selective belief in the unknown. This seems to manifest itself as either a desire to discredit those that witness creatures whose existence we do not accept ( i.e. - yes to Bigfoot, no to Nessie!) or conversely seeks to attach a personal spiritual or supernatural significance to their abilities (i.e. - camouflage and infrasound as spiritual power!) This particular DIY pseudo-spirituality being something that has seen a resurgence in recent years, due largely to the influential absence of organized religion on western societies.

3 Sides To Every Story

As the old adage goes however, there are of course always 3 sides to every story, My side, your side and the truth! Therein enters the spectre of perspective and the ugly ogre of subjectivity to which every scientist and layman alike must give deference and bend the knee. Anyone who thinks he is above this particularity is simply fooling himself; and is hopelessly shackled to the notion of his fallacious philosophy as fact, which of course as we all know, is inadmissible evidence when it comes to explaining  the unknown.

How Do You Describe A Sight Never Before Seen?

When interpreting the extraordinary, we would do well to remember those dumbfounded souls who have gone before us and similarly to ourselves, have used a religious perspective to interpret the seemingly unexplainable sights that assailed their otherwise acute senses. One thinks of the Aztecs seeing the ships of Cortes in the distance and imagining them floating mountains  or in their ruler Moctezuma the 2nd, who thought Cortes to be the god, Quetzalcoatl, returning from the east; and thus saw the arrival of Cortes and his men as sacred. This blind belief, sadly signaling the beginning of the end for the Aztec nation.

Yet another lesson in the paucity of perception can be found in the first descriptions of the former cryptid and original wildman of the woods, the Gorilla, which is a wonderful example of an ill fitting substitute being used to describe that, for which we have no applicable comparative reference in nature. This 'Hairy Man' of the forest, originally known to the Mpongwe people as the shy, yet ferocious Enge-ena, may in fact stand as a template for the modern day Bigfoot (Sasquatch, Wodewose, Yeren, Almas or Yeti) in that its folkloric reputation and characteristic ape-like features and behavior, mimics those reputed to belong to our mysterious wood apes. Even the name Gorilla, meaning "tribe of hairy women" in an ancient Greek, Γόριλλαι) was reputed to have been given to a savage tribe, who confronted the Carthaginian, Hanno The Explorer, when he travelled to what is no Sierra Leone in 500 BC.

Interposing Personal Preferences on 'Paranormal' Pareidolia

Staring with popular TV shows like Finding Bigfoot and its many comical spin offs (Killing Bigfoot) and then spreading out to various social media sole practitioners; The 'Squatch' truly has become a western hemispheric phenomenon! This in itself has brought to the field of 'Bigfootery' a rather divergent and loosely connected crowd, simultaneously incorporating many faiths, that includes anything from the underwhelmingly mystical to the overtly scientific and more besides, each in turn staking a claim to owning superior theory, but being just as reliant as the others on faithful disposition to prove their conclusions. I have, for example, lost count of just how many red circled blurry bushes I have had to stare at, out of politeness, whilst being fed some unlikely tale of a trusted daily communion with the alleged creature/s that somehow fails to yield any clear pictures! Or conversely, how many pseudo-empirical brush offs of corroborative physical and photographic evidence do we have to endure, to offer up a pleasing and scientific atonement, to prove the existence of what appears to be a very shy and intelligent animal? Finally, the finical reward of chasing the beast that is Bigfoot seems to be too lucrative to dissuade the entrepreneurial kind from plundering the pockets of the naive or even just the nostalgic pilgrims of the paranormal, to whom the possibility of the unknown overrules the probably and paves the way to poorer probity.

Who Are Woo???

Again, the absence of corporate religion and the search for spiritual importance in our modern age has led to all types of paranormal pursuits that feel as though they have been forced upon cryptozoology like an ill fitting shoe. We hear much about Bigfoot 'cloaking,' much like the creature, the Predator in the 1980s action movie turned franchise; and immediately have to wonder if indeed life apes film or is it more likely to be vice versa; that our mentally ingested creatures of the stage and screen are brought forth in unusual and stressful circumstances, in which we find ourselves lacking a descriptive reference to provide and easy in and out explanation for what he have just experienced? Many animals that change their color, camouflage or 'cloak,' like the Octopus or Cuttlefish, are well within the boundaries of natural science, but may not have been perceived as otherwise by those uninitiate natives who first beheld their magical abilities centuries ago!

Indelibly Impressed Upon The Mind, The Awesome Inaccuracy Of Anecdote

So what can we conclude? Simply that anecdote is more oft than not an accurate portrayal of experience of the witness, but fallible due to its subjectivity to the comparative mental library stored within the witness's own mind and of course their ability to respond and function in highly stressful and confusing situations. This is the reason that even witnesses of the same phenomena are treated piecemeal and preferably separated one from the other in order to gain an uncontaminated rendering of the experience. There are of course several threats to genuine reporting in the current climate of commercial bigfoot, which undoubtedly pose a threat to unimpeded scientific study. Albeit, there is much that needs to be done to restore the credibility of the much maligned witness. I personally feel that  a wholesale rejection of 'draw a circle around it' evidence and the fanciful fantasies of 'the monster whisperers' who seem to be able to simply assert that they are chosen, and perceptive and communicating on a higher plane as proof beyond doubt that their blurry bush buddies are ultimately deserving of a red circle and a whole host of happy devotees, is at last a start on the road to real discovery, whether those discoveries be of the conventional persuasion or the paranormal.

Written by Andrew McGrath

Beasts of Britain is now available in Paperback and Kindle.

Follow 'Beasts of Britain' on Facebook and Twitter

Check out Andy's blog here.

Cryptid Culture #7

The 7th issue of Cryptid Culture Magazine is available now. I have an article in it called "'Sea Monsters' of 2017." It's a look at some strange marine remains that were said to be Sea Monsters that were found this year.

Other contributors include:

  • Colin Schneider, "So, You Want to be a Cryptozoologist?"
  • Rob Menzies - "Alaskan Monsters"
  • Scott Marlow - "Red Haired Giant"
  • Brian Parsons - "Black Panther Sightings"
And more!

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

"Bigfoot Sighting or Tourism Boost?"

That's the title of a new article up on the Fort Worth, TX Star-Telegram website.

It reads:

"Troopers responded to an alleged Bigfoot sighting off the shoulder of a major highway in Nebraska Saturday evening.
"Nebraska State Patrol posted the report on Facebook and wrote that a trooper responded to the sighting in Hastings, Neb.
"The trooper reported back that 'Sasquatch remained elusive,' sate police said on Facebook. 'Must have just missed him.'
"Harriett Mcfeely told the Grand Valley Independent that she called police Saturday evening to report the sighting as she and her friend Robin Roberts were on their way back from Colorado. She said her friend spotted the 'big, heavy and stocky' creature off the shoulder of I-80.
"'I said, 'Is this considered an official sighting of a Bigfoot? They said definitely,'' Mcfeely told the newspaper.
"Mcfeely is CEO and founder of the Nebraska Bigfoot Crossroads of America, according to her Facebook page. She said she started believing in Bigfoot at the age of 8 in 1953 when mountaineer Edmund Hillary saw Yeti footprints while climbing Mount Everest, according to the organization's website. She's been researching and chasing after Sasquatch rumors ever since.
"She told the Grand Valley Independent that she's never seen Bigfoot in Nebraska before, but her friend saw the creature in an area next to a river and Bigfoot tends to hang out by rivers.
"Some people on Facebook said the reported sighting was fake in an effort to boost tourism. The Nebraska Bigfoot Crossroads of America is hosting it's next annual conference next February.
"'This might make a big Nebraska tourism campaign,' one person wrote. 'We had the total eclipse last summer. Let's promote Bigfoot hunting in 2018.'
"According to the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, there have only been 14 other Bigfoot sightings in Nebraska.
"The most popular state for Bigfoot sightings? Washington has more than 600 sightings, according to the database.
"Recently, the Carolina region was in the national spotlight for an alleged Bigfoot sighting in August outside of Charlotte, the Charlotte Observer reports. The Greenville, S.C., police department posted a warning not to shoot at Bigfoot because 'you'll most likely be wounding a fun-loving and well-intentioned person, sweating in a gorilla costume.'
"Bigfoot has been a prominent figure in pop culture recently, as the movie Son of Bigfoot was released in November and new series, 'Killing Bigfoot,' premiered earlier this year on the Destination America channel." 
Not too sure on this story, though it lost credibility to me when it was mentioned that the witness was head of a Bigfoot group and was hosting a conference in the area.

On another note, just because the BFRO only has 14 reported sightings in Nebraska doesn't mean there have only been 14 ever. Those are just the ones reported to the BFRO that they decided to put on their website, and many are probably never reported.

Also, "Nebraska Bigfoot Crossroads of America" isn't that great of a name.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

The Flatwoods Monster - Teaser

Here's a short teaser for Small Town Monsters' upcoming documentary The Flatwoods Monster: A Legacy of Fear, 1950s horror movie style!
Full-length trailer comes out Friday.

Cryptid U.S. for Christmas

Need a good Christmas gift for a cryptid fan in your life? Head on over to Amazon and get them a copy of Cryptid U.S. so they can learn more about all of America's most mysterious monsters!

"Do you believe in monsters?
"On October 20, 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin encountered a large, man-like creature in Bluff Creek, California. Point Pleasant, WV, was terrorized by a flying monster in 1966. Sandra Mansi saw a 'monster' rise out of Lake Champlain in 1977. A strange creature called the 'chupacabras' attacked many helpless farm animals in Florida, Arizona, and Texas in 1996. These are just a few examples of sightings of strange monsters, called cryptids, seen in the United States. Reports of these creatures, which range from Bigfoot, to lake monsters, black panthers, Thunderbirds, werewolves, and even an occasional live pterosaur, come from every state. This book is a compilation of five years of research on strange, unidentifiable creatures. Other creatures covered include: -The Ohio Grassman - The Bishopville Lizard Man - The Dover Demon - The Beast of Bray Road - Giant Snakes - The Green-Clawed Beast - Flathead Lake Monster, and more!"