Skip to main content

Science Professor Talks Bigfoot

A new article is up about Dr. Mark Wilson's Bigfoot talk that I went to on Monday:

"LOUDONVILLE, Ohio -- Bigfoot believers and skeptics alike packed Loudonville's Ohio Theatre on Monday night for a scientific discussion of the legendary ape-human hybrid said to roam the North American continent.
"Mark Wilson, a geology and natural sciences professor at the College of Wooster, led the presentation, titled 'A Scientific Perspective on Bigfoot,' to explain scientists do not believe it's likely the creature truly exists.
 "'I've long been interested in the Bigfoot legend and other strange and unusual things,' Wilson said.
"Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch or Grassman in Ohio, is usually described as a large, hairy, bipedal, ape-like creature that lives in the woods of North America.
"Wilson used the scientific method, starting with the hypothesis: 'Bigfoot is real.'
"He then listed several examples of reported proof, like footprints, remains, DNA, photographs, videos and eyewitness reports.
"But with each category of evidence, Wilson disproved the hypothesis, explaining why each is not scientifically convincing.
"'Scientists don't think it's very likely that Bigfoot is out there… There's no evidence yet to support the 'Bigfoot is real' hypothesis,' he said. 
"Footprints, DNA, remains, photographs and films have been faked and disproved in the past, he said.
"'There are too many doubts, too many errors, too many possibilities of fraud,' he said.
"One of the most frequent examples of proof is eyewitness accounts.
"Some audience members told Wilson during the presentation stories of their experiences, like a sighting in the woods or casts of footprints.
"And about half of the more than 300 audience members raised their hands when asked if they believe in Bigfoot.
"But Wilson said these accounts are not reliable and therefore not scientifically convincing.
"'The problem is that eyewitness accounts are shockingly poor in reporting what actually happened,' he said. 'They make good stories, but they don't make good science.'
"Wilson also examined several reasons it's not likely the creature exists.
"There has never been any real biological evidence, like bodies, bones, skin, hairs or DNA, found, he said.
"'To have an animal be real in the world of science, we have to have some real part of that animal,' he said. 'And there's nothing, nothing at all.'
"Additionally, any kind of hominid, like a Bigfoot, would need a significant population of hundreds of individuals to reproduce.
"'You should have lots of them out there, and we don't,' he said.
"And primates generally flourish in tropical and subtropical locations, like South America, equatorial Africa and southeast Asia, Wilson said.
"'It's not a likely place to find an unknown, bipedal hominid,' he said.
"Wilson said the myth persists because it's a tale that's easy to fake. Human perception is easily fooled, he said, so it's difficult to rely on what people say they see, especially if they already believe in Bigfoot and are looking for evidence to support it.
"The Bigfoot industry is also profitable, Wilson said, with television shows, conferences, equipment and tours geared toward the creature.
"He said he believes it remains a classic tale in American folklore.
"'I think it's fun to think of mysterious creatures in the woods,' he said. 'They add flavor to a world that's increasingly civilized … to have this unattained hominid lurking around in the woods. … It's really quite a romantic concept.'
"Loudonville's Cleo Redd Fisher Museum of the Mohican Historical Society hosted the program.
"The discussion was originally to be held at the museum, which holds about 100 people, but after interest skyrocketed, the event was moved to the Ohio Theatre, said museum curator Kenny Libben.
"He invited Wilson to speak after he took a class with Wilson on pseudo-science issues.
"'I know there's a lot of Bigfoot believers in town,' said Libben, who said he believes it's unlikely but not impossible Bigfoot exists.
"Wilson was also featured on two 2012 episodes of the History Channel's show 'Ancient Aliens,' discussing dinosaurs, earthquakes and floods.
"'We were scientists,' he said. 'We weren't 'Ancient Aliens' theorists, but traditional scientists.'"

While I do agree that the things Wilson discussed don't prove Bigfoot exists, I don't think that means all the witnesses over hundreds of years are lying. Something is out there.

Dr. Mark Wilson


Popular posts from this blog

The Burrunjor - A Present-Day Australian Dinosaur?

Australia is said to be home to a variety of cryptid creatures, from the aquatic Bunyip, the man-like Yowies and Wakkis, and the thylacine. There is another, however, that could be considered stranger than all the others. Why? Because its said to be something that should have gone extinct 65 million years ago!

The creature in question is called the Burrunjor, and is said to be a surviving dinosaur. Now, before you think that there is no possible way the Burrunjor could be real, remember that there are sightings and stories of other dinosaur-like creatures from around the world - for example, the mokele-mbembe, kongamato, and others in Africa, "Mounatin Boomers" in the U.S., the Partridge Creek Monster, and more.

Over the years there have been many sightings and stories of the Burrunjor in Australia, including this one from Rex and Heather Gilroy from the 1970s:

"In 1978, a Northern Territory bushman and explorer, Bryan Clark, related a story of his own that had taken pl…

Some Thoughts on Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition

So far, two episodes of Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition have aired. Here are some of my thoughts on the show.

First off, let's start with the team, the Midnight Sons. There are a few new members on the team this season. The old leader, Little Bear, is gone, and now Crusty (the guy with the bear claw in his beard) is leader of the team. Other members are: Dudley (new guy), the team "forensic expert," Todd, the "trap engineer," Bulldog (new guy), the "survival expert," Rhett, the "greenhorn" (rookie), and of course Face, the "veteran tracker."

Compared to the AIMS Team of Mountain Monsters, Crusty is Trapper, Todd is Willy, Rhett is Buck, Bulldog would probably be Huckleberry, Dudley would probably be Jeff, and Face would be Wild Bill.

I haven't seen the first episode, "Bigfoot of the Arctic Circle: Siberian Giant," but I did watch episode two, "Bigfoot of Denali: Wind Walker" last Saturday. I actually though…

Mountain Monsters - Coming Back in 2018?

Destination America's Mountain Monsters was a huge hit when it premiered in 2013. It's had five seasons through last year.

Season 3 started a "Bigfoot Edition" and season 4 introduced a "rogue team." Last season focused entirely on this "rogue team" and ended with really no conclusion.

Over the past 2 Saturdays, some old season 2 episodes of Mountain Monsters have been playing in the evenings. Could this be a sign that the show might be back for another season this year, or does it have no meaning at all?

If the show does come back, where can they go? Last season made absolutely no sense at all and the whole thing was pretty stupid. If it does come back, I think they should go back to just monster hunting like they did in the first two seasons. Once they went to just "Bigfoot Edition" things went downhill quick.