Skip to main content

The Yeti is not an Abominable Snowman

I used to be one to believe that the Yeti was a giant human-like creature just like Bigfoot. Lots of other people think that when they think "yeti", too. But, the truth is, the yeti is anything but an "Abominable Snowman."
Image result for yeti

To start things, lets find out where the term "Abominable Snowman" came from, for those who may not know.
Charles Howard-Bury
In 1921, Lieutenanat Colonel Charles Howard-Bury led the 1921 British Mount Everest reconnaissance expedition. While on the expedition, he found footprints he thought were caused by a "large, 'loping' grew wolf" that had caused double-tracks (an animal sometimes steps its back foot in its front footprint, making it look like one footprint. Skeptics will say bears do this and make "bigfoot" tracks. I think Bigfoot makes Bigfoot tracks.) Hoawrd-Bury thought this was how the wolf made tracks that looked "rather like those of a bare-footed man." His Sherpa guides immediately said the tracks were made by the "wild man of the snows," or "metoh-kangmi." (Metoh: "man-bear", kangmi: "snowman.")

In 1938, Bill Tilman wrote a book and described Howard-Bury's footprints, but called the thing "metch-kangmi." "Metch" is not a word in the Tibetan language. Thus, through a mis-translation, the term "Abominable Snowman" was created.

Because of this name, most people think of something like a bigfoot(and usually white) when they think "Yeti" or they think of a literal snowman. Well, the Yeti definetly isn't a "snowman," and it most likely isn't a Bigfoot of the Himalayas, either.

Wait, what?!

Yes, that is coming from me. The Yeti is not an "Abominable Snowman." It is not a Bigfoot. I'm 99% sure it isn't any sort of "ape-man," either.
Bryan Sykes
In 2013/14, Bryan Sykes did DNA research on Bigfoot/Yeti, etc. His DNA from the "Yeti" came back as bear DNA. In 2013, Sykes and his team said it appeared that the Yeti DNA was that of a Pleistocene polar bear. In 2014, however, it was revealed that the team made an error on the DNA study, and that it came from a modern brown bear.
The Yeti?
Well, there you go. That's it.

Well, actually, I have a little more.
Reindold Messner
Earlier this month I read Reinhold Messner's book My Quest for the Yeti. In 1986, Messner was in the Himalayas and spotted what he thought was a Yeti. He then spent years trying to find out what the Yeti really was. Lots of Tibetans called the Yeti "chemo," and it turned out that the "chemo" was a bear. Messner ended up seeing several chemos, and became convinced that they were the Yetis.
Very good book
I used to be one to think that the Yeti couldn't be anything but a Bigfoot of the Himalayas. Now, though, as I stated earlier, I'm 99% sure that the yeti is a bear, of some sort, at least.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Burrunjor - A Present-Day Australian Dinosaur?

Australia is said to be home to a variety of cryptid creatures, from the aquatic Bunyip, the man-like Yowies and Wakkis, and the thylacine. There is another, however, that could be considered stranger than all the others. Why? Because its said to be something that should have gone extinct 65 million years ago!

The creature in question is called the Burrunjor, and is said to be a surviving dinosaur. Now, before you think that there is no possible way the Burrunjor could be real, remember that there are sightings and stories of other dinosaur-like creatures from around the world - for example, the mokele-mbembe, kongamato, and others in Africa, "Mounatin Boomers" in the U.S., the Partridge Creek Monster, and more.

Over the years there have been many sightings and stories of the Burrunjor in Australia, including this one from Rex and Heather Gilroy from the 1970s:

"In 1978, a Northern Territory bushman and explorer, Bryan Clark, related a story of his own that had taken pl…

Some Thoughts on Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition

So far, two episodes of Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition have aired. Here are some of my thoughts on the show.

First off, let's start with the team, the Midnight Sons. There are a few new members on the team this season. The old leader, Little Bear, is gone, and now Crusty (the guy with the bear claw in his beard) is leader of the team. Other members are: Dudley (new guy), the team "forensic expert," Todd, the "trap engineer," Bulldog (new guy), the "survival expert," Rhett, the "greenhorn" (rookie), and of course Face, the "veteran tracker."

Compared to the AIMS Team of Mountain Monsters, Crusty is Trapper, Todd is Willy, Rhett is Buck, Bulldog would probably be Huckleberry, Dudley would probably be Jeff, and Face would be Wild Bill.

I haven't seen the first episode, "Bigfoot of the Arctic Circle: Siberian Giant," but I did watch episode two, "Bigfoot of Denali: Wind Walker" last Saturday. I actually though…

Mountain Monsters - Coming Back in 2018?

Destination America's Mountain Monsters was a huge hit when it premiered in 2013. It's had five seasons through last year.

Season 3 started a "Bigfoot Edition" and season 4 introduced a "rogue team." Last season focused entirely on this "rogue team" and ended with really no conclusion.

Over the past 2 Saturdays, some old season 2 episodes of Mountain Monsters have been playing in the evenings. Could this be a sign that the show might be back for another season this year, or does it have no meaning at all?

If the show does come back, where can they go? Last season made absolutely no sense at all and the whole thing was pretty stupid. If it does come back, I think they should go back to just monster hunting like they did in the first two seasons. Once they went to just "Bigfoot Edition" things went downhill quick.