Skip to main content

Should We Shoot Bigfoot?

That is the subject of a new article on Mysterious Universe by Nick Redfern.

Redfern starts off his article by talking about the recent killing of Cecil the lion. Last month, a dentist, Walter Palmer, from the US went to Africa (and paid $50,000!) to go on a big game hunt in Africa. Palmer and a guide lured Cecil out of his protected area, and killed him. The guide, Theo Bronkhorst, claims he did nothing wrong. "I do not feel I have done anything wrong." He said. Well, he did. Palmer is also in hiding. If you don't think you did anything wrong, why do you have to hide???
Cecil the lion and his killer, Walter Palmer

In Redfern's post, he talks about how people might react (and what the consequences might be) if someone goes out and kills a Bigfoot to "prove they exist." Does he support the killing of one of the creatures? No. Why?

He has several reasons. First, we don't know how many Bigfoots are living on the North American continent. Some think there are hundreds of thousands of Bigfoots. Redfern says that he thinks there are far less. I think that, too. I think there are lots of Bigfoots in North America, but not hundreds of thousands. Second, why would someone want to kill Bigfoot? Probably just to say "I killed Bigfoot first," Redfern says. He does not support that either. Neither do I. Third, what would be the consequences if Bigfoot turned out to be some sort of human?

You can check out Redfern's article by clicking the first link in this post.

As people who have read posts on this blog or my book or know me will know, I am also on the no-kill side of Bigfooters. Redfern makes some good points. Anyone looking to kill a Sasquatch should consider them, for a while, before going out and doing it. You may not be thought of as someone awesome, it will probably be the opposite.

In recent years, there have been a number of people who claim to have killed a Bigfoot. Justin Smeja said he killed one, but then buried the body! Just left it. It's not like he had evidence for bigfoot in the form of a body or anything. When he went back he just found some hair. When Bryan Sykes did a DNA test, he found it to be a bear. I think Smeja's story is a bunch of crap. The same goes for Rick Dyer and his "dead Bigfoots" which are known hoaxes.

There was also a TV show in 2014 with the GCBRO called Killing Bigfoot. Did they end up killing a Bigfoot? No. I actually never watched the show just because they wanted to shoot a Bigfoot. That and you know they aren't going to find anything if its a TV show.

Like Redfern, I hope that, if we someday "prove" to the scientific community Bigfoot exists, that it is with DNA, hair samples, film footage, or something of the sort. Or even a naturally dead body. But not a Bigfoot someone killed with a gun.

Don't shoot Bigfoot, Teddy...


Popular posts from this blog

The Burrunjor - A Present-Day Australian Dinosaur?

Australia is said to be home to a variety of cryptid creatures, from the aquatic Bunyip, the man-like Yowies and Wakkis, and the thylacine. There is another, however, that could be considered stranger than all the others. Why? Because its said to be something that should have gone extinct 65 million years ago!

The creature in question is called the Burrunjor, and is said to be a surviving dinosaur. Now, before you think that there is no possible way the Burrunjor could be real, remember that there are sightings and stories of other dinosaur-like creatures from around the world - for example, the mokele-mbembe, kongamato, and others in Africa, "Mounatin Boomers" in the U.S., the Partridge Creek Monster, and more.

Over the years there have been many sightings and stories of the Burrunjor in Australia, including this one from Rex and Heather Gilroy from the 1970s:

"In 1978, a Northern Territory bushman and explorer, Bryan Clark, related a story of his own that had taken pl…

Some Thoughts on Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition

So far, two episodes of Alaska Monsters: Bigfoot Edition have aired. Here are some of my thoughts on the show.

First off, let's start with the team, the Midnight Sons. There are a few new members on the team this season. The old leader, Little Bear, is gone, and now Crusty (the guy with the bear claw in his beard) is leader of the team. Other members are: Dudley (new guy), the team "forensic expert," Todd, the "trap engineer," Bulldog (new guy), the "survival expert," Rhett, the "greenhorn" (rookie), and of course Face, the "veteran tracker."

Compared to the AIMS Team of Mountain Monsters, Crusty is Trapper, Todd is Willy, Rhett is Buck, Bulldog would probably be Huckleberry, Dudley would probably be Jeff, and Face would be Wild Bill.

I haven't seen the first episode, "Bigfoot of the Arctic Circle: Siberian Giant," but I did watch episode two, "Bigfoot of Denali: Wind Walker" last Saturday. I actually though…

Mountain Monsters - Coming Back in 2018?

Destination America's Mountain Monsters was a huge hit when it premiered in 2013. It's had five seasons through last year.

Season 3 started a "Bigfoot Edition" and season 4 introduced a "rogue team." Last season focused entirely on this "rogue team" and ended with really no conclusion.

Over the past 2 Saturdays, some old season 2 episodes of Mountain Monsters have been playing in the evenings. Could this be a sign that the show might be back for another season this year, or does it have no meaning at all?

If the show does come back, where can they go? Last season made absolutely no sense at all and the whole thing was pretty stupid. If it does come back, I think they should go back to just monster hunting like they did in the first two seasons. Once they went to just "Bigfoot Edition" things went downhill quick.